Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Repealed and replaced by the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from 1 July 2024. It still governs offences and proceedings from before that date.
654 Supreme Court judgments considering this law. Search within these.
-
Bharat Sher Singh Kalsia v. State of Bihar & Anr.
Whether the High Court was justified in rejecting the prayer for quashing of the FIR registered u/ss. 409, 467, 468, 471 and 420 IPC against the vendee for the criminal acts, misuse of power of attorney-PoA, misappropriation of…
-
Sachin Garg v. State of U.P. and Anr.
In a case wherein the dispute was commercial in nature having no element of criminality, whether the Magistrate was justified in issuing summons for trial u/ss.406, 504 and 506, Penal Code, 1860 and the High Court in dismissing…
-
Shatrughna Atmaram Patil & Ors. v. Vinod Dodhu Chaudhary & Anr.
One R (owner) sold premises in dispute to five persons. Thereafter, R committed suicide and left behind a suicide note, naming the tenants, who were in possession of premises in question, as abettors. On the strength of the same,…
-
Ajitsinh Chehuji Rathod v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
Appellant-accused convicted u/s.138, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, had claimed mismatch of signatures on the cheque in question. His application for comparison of the signature as appearing on the cheque through the…
-
Central Bureau of Investigation v. Kapil Wadhawan & Anr.
Whether the respondents were entitled to the benefit of the statutory right conferred under the proviso to s.167(2), Cr.P.C, on the ground that the investigation qua some of the accused named in the FIR was pending, though the…
-
Atamjit Singh v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Whether the High Court was justified in quashing the order passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate summoning Respondent No. 2 in relation to commission of offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, on the…
-
Kusha Duruka v. The State of Odisha
Matter pertains to the prerequisites to be mandatorily mentioned in the application filed for grant of bail; and effect of non-mentioning of details of previous bail applications and order in all bail applications.
-
Nara Chandrababu Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
Interpretation of s.17A, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 incorporated by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 26 of 2018 and its applicability to the facts of the present case.
-
State of Haryana v. Mohd. Yunus & Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in convicting A1 only u/s. 323 while acquitting u/s. 302/34, and convicting and sentencing A2 u/s. 302 and 323 read with s. 34; and whether in trial u/s. 302 IPC, it is safe to convict on the…
-
Dinesh Gupta v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.
Despite the commercial nature of the dispute involved, criminal complaint was filed and an FIR was registered against the appellants. Whether, the High Court was justified in refusing to quash the FIR and the summoning order.
-
Bilkis Yakub Rasool v. Union of India & Others
Writ petition filed u/Art. 32 by one of the victims challenging the order of State of Gujarat granting remission and early release of 11 convicts held guilty in Bilkis Bano matter, if maintainable; writ petitions filed as Public…
-
Gurdev Singh Bhalla v. State of Punjab & Ors
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the Revision filed by the appellant against the order of the Special Judge allowing the application u/s. 319 CrPC summoning the appellant along with three other officials of the…
-
Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab
Whether the prosecution had proved beyond reasonable doubt, the entire chain of circumstances, not leaving any link missing for the appellant to escape from the clutches of law.
-
Perumal Raja @ Perumal v. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police
Accused not formally arrested at the time of giving information if can be deemed to be in the ‘custody’ of the police, admissibility of evidence in terms of s.27, Evidence Act, 1872. Conviction and sentence of the appellant…
-
Neeraj Sharma v. State of Chhattisgarh
Conviction and sentence of the appellants, inter alia, for offence u/s.364-A, Penal Code, 1860, if justified.
- Iqram v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors
- Xyz v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors
- The State Represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police v. Tr N Seenivasagan
- Pradeep Ram v. The State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- Chandra Bhawan Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
- Gandi Doddabasappa @ Gandhi Basavaraj v. State of Karnataka
- Indian Bank Association and Others v. Union of India and Others
- Life Convict Bengal @ Khoka @ Prasanta Sen v. B.K. Srivastava & Ors.
- Ashok Sadarangani & Anr. v. Union of !Noia & Ors.
- State of Punjab & Ors. v. Inder Mohan Chopra & Ors.
- State of Himachal Pradesh v. Manoj Kumar @ Chhotu
- Sarabjit Rick Singh v. Union of India
- Dayal Singh v. State of Maharashtra
- State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran and Anr.
- Chandrappa and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- Bishnu Prasad Sinha & Anr. v. State of Assam
- Hori Lal and Anr. v. State of U.P
- Mohan Raj v. Dimbeswari Saikia & Anr
- Tarakeshwar Sahu v. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)
- Gajanand Agarwal v. State of Orissa and Ors.
- State of Karnataka and Anr. v. Pastor P. Raju
- Om Prakash v. State of U.P.
- Rajbir Singh v. State of U.P. and Anr.
- Shiva Nath Prasad v. State of West Bengal and Ors.
- Md. Munna v. Union of India and Ors.