General Clauses Act, 1897
18 Supreme Court judgments considering this law. Search within these.
-
K.S. Manjunath and Others v. Moorasavirappa @ Muttanna Chennappa
Whether the High Court committed any error in passing the impugned judgment whereby it allowed the appeals filed by the vendees and set aside the decree passed by the Trial Court, while granting the relief of specific performance…
-
M/s Anvita Auto Tech Works Pvt. Ltd. v. M/s Aroush Motors & Anr.
Whether the High Court was correct in observing that on account of non-filing of written statement by the defendant, his right to cross-examination is taken away.
-
Nagarajan & Anr. v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Whether the benefit of the provisions of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 can be granted to the appellants; if the answer to the aforesaid issue is in the negative, can the reduced sentence that the Food Safety and Standards…
-
M/S. Coal India Limited v. Commissioner of Customs (Port), Customs House, Kolkata
Whether the engineering and technical service fees/agency commission/charges paid by the appellant and its subsidiaries to the local agent of the overseas supplier were includable in the assessable value of the imported goods…
-
Puja Ferro Alloys P Ltd. v. State of Goa and Ors.
Whether the appellant-companies are covered by the notification issued by the State dated 30.09.1991 for the purpose of availing 25% rebate on the tariff chargeable for availing power supply.
-
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. v. Prism Cement Limited & Anr.
Whether the amendment to s.8(5) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (CST Act), introduced by the Finance Act, 2002, applies retrospectively to take away tax exemption benefits granted under the Package Scheme of Incentives, 1993…
-
M/S S.R.S. Travels by Its Proprietor K.T. Rajashekar v. The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Workers & Ors.
Issue arose as regards the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2003 repealing the Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 particularly given that…
-
My Preferred Transformation & Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S Faridabad Implements Pvt. Ltd.
Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the petition filed by the appellants u/s.34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by time; whether the provisions of Limitation Act, 1963 apply to s.34 of the…
-
P. Manikandan v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Ors.
Whether the High Court was justified in directing re-investigation and retrial of the same offence on the same set of facts, after acquitting the accused by giving him the benefit of doubt; Whether, in the attending fact and…
-
(Reliance Communications v. Commissioner of Service
Whether the mobile service providers who pay excise duties on various items for setting up their business more particularly for erection of mobile towers and peripherals like pre-fabricated buildings etc. can take the benefit of…
-
Nabha Power Limited & Anr. v. Punjab State Power Coroporation Limited & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether the press release of 01.10.2009 announcing the decision of the Union Cabinet about approval of certain modifications envisaged in the then existing mega power policy, is covered within the meaning of the…
-
Limited & Ors. v. Bapuna Alcobrew Private Limited & Anr.
Issue arose as to whether s.56(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 has application to a demand raised by appellants-distributor on the first respondent for recovery of sums payable under the Electricity Act, 1910 and, whether demand,…
-
Industries Ltd. v. Union of India [2000] Supp. 4 SCR 44 : (2001) 1
The questions which arose for determination are as to what is the true nature of royalty determined u/s.9 r/w s.15(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957; whether royalty is in the nature of tax; what…
-
The State of West Bengal Represented Through the Secretary & Ors. v. Rajpath Contractors and Engineers Ltd.
Issue arose as regards correctness of the order passed by the High Court dismissing the petition u/s. 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, holding that it was not filed within the period specified under sub-section (3) of…
-
Pernod Ricard India (P) Ltd. v. The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Issue as regards the applicability of the relevant rule for imposition of penalty. Whether it was the rule that existed when the violation occurred during the license period of 2009-10 (rule 19 of Madhya Pradesh Foreign Liquor…
-
The State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Paresh Nathalal Chauhan
Matter pertains to expunction of the observation by the High Court in an interim order that statutory protection contemplated u/s. 157 of the GST Act, in the nature of a good faith clause, not available to the officers of the…
-
Ram Nath v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Interplay between the provisions of Chapter IX of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (FSSA) and ss.272 and 273 of the Penal Code, 1860; whether the view taken by the Allahabad High Court in the case of M/s. Pepsico India…
-
Jagmohan and Another v. Badri Nath and Others
Exemption of pre-emption as granted vide notification dated 08.10.1985, if available to the urban immovable property on which right of pre-emption was sought to be exercised by the tenants.