Income-tax Act, 1961 · Chapter XV: Liability in Special Cases · G.—Partition
Section 171: Assessment after partition of a Hindu undivided family
The Income-tax Act, 1961 was repealed by the Income-tax Act, 2025 from 1 April 2026. The text is kept here because the judgments below apply it.
In plain words
A Hindu undivided family assessed as such continues to be treated as undivided unless the Assessing Officer records a finding of partition under this section.
- When partition is claimed during assessment, the officer must inquire after notice to all members.
- The officer records whether there was a total or partial partition and its date.
- If partition took place during the previous year, income up to the date of partition is assessed as if there was no partition.
- All members are jointly and severally liable for the tax, each in proportion to the share of property they received.
- If the officer finds after assessment that a partition had already happened, tax can be recovered from every former member.
A simplified explanation, prepared with AI assistance from the official text below and checked automatically against it for numbers and cross-references. The official text is the law and prevails over this summary. Not legal advice.
Official text
(1) A Hindu family hitherto assessed as undivided shall be deemed for the purposes of this Act to continue to be a Hindu undivided family, except where and in so far as a finding of partition has been given under this section in respect of the Hindu undivided family.
(2) Where, at the time of making an assessment under section 143 or section 144, it is claimed by or on behalf of any member of a Hindu family assessed as undivided that a partition, whether total or partial, has taken place among the members of such family, the [Assessing Officer] shall make an inquiry thereinto after giving notice of the inquiry to all the members of the family.
(3) On the completion of the inquiry, the [Assessing Officer] shall record a finding as to whether there has been a total or partial partition of the joint family property, and, if there has been such a partition, the date on which it has taken place.
(4) Where a finding of total or partial partition has been recorded by the [Assessing Officer] under this section, and the partition took place during the previous year,—
(a) the total income of the joint family in respect of the period up to the date of partition shall be assessed as if no partition had taken place; and
(b) each member or group of members shall, in addition to any tax for which he or it may be separately liable and notwithstanding anything contained in clause (2) of section 10, be jointly and severally liable for the tax on the income so assessed.
(5) Where a finding of total or partial partition has been recorded by the [Assessing Officer] under this section, and the partition took place after the expiry of the previous year, the total income of the
previous year of the joint family shall be assessed as if no partition had taken place; and the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (4) shall, so far as may be, apply to the case.
(6) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, if the [Assessing Officer] finds after completion of the assessment of a Hindu undivided family that the family has already effected a partition, whether total or partial, the [Assessing Officer] shall proceed to recover the tax from every person who was a member of the family before the partition, and every such person shall be jointly and severally liable for the tax on the income so assessed.
(7) For the purposes of this section, the several liability of any member or group of members thereunder shall be computed according to the portion of the joint family property allotted to him or it at the partition, whether total or partial.
(8) The provisions of this section shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the levy and collection of any penalty, interest, fine or other sum in respect of any period up to date of the partition, whether total or partial, of a Hindu undivided family as they apply in relation to the levy and collection of tax in respect of any such period. [(9) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing provisions of this section, where a partial partition has taken place after the 31st day of December, 1978, among the members of a Hindu undivided family hitherto assessed as undivided,—
(a) no claim that such partial partition has taken place shall be inquired into under sub-section (2) and no finding shall be recorded under sub-section (3) that such partial partition had taken place and any finding recorded under sub-section (3) to that effect whether before or after the 18th day of June, 1980, being the date of introduction of the Finance (No. 2) Bill, 1980, shall be null and void;
(b) such family shall continue to be liable to be assessed under this Act as if no such partial partition had taken place;
(c) each member or group of members of such family immediately before such partial partition and the family shall be jointly and severally liable for any tax, penalty, interest, fine or other sum payable under this Act by the family in respect of any period, whether before or after such partial partition;
(d) the several liability of any member or group of members aforesaid shall be computed according to the portion of the joint family property allotted to him or it at such partial partition, and the provisions of this Act shall apply accordingly.]
Explanation.—In this section,—
(a) —partition‖ means—
(i) where the property admits of a physical division, a physical division of the property, but a physical division of the income without a physical division of the property producing the income shall not be deemed to be a partition; or
(ii) where the property does not admit of a physical division, then such division as the property admits of, but a mere severance of status shall not be deemed to be a partition;
(b) —partial partition‖ means a partition which is partial as regards the persons constituting the Hindu undivided family, or the properties belonging to the Hindu undivided family, or both.
H.—Profits of non-residents from occasional shipping business
Source: India Code (Legislative Department), the text of the Act as it stood before its repeal. Words in square brackets [ ] were inserted or substituted by later amending Acts, and *** marks words omitted by an amendment. The amendment footnotes are not reproduced here. Official text on India Code.
Supreme Court judgments citing the section 171
- Subodh Kant Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1)Delhi & Anr
- Ankit Agarwal -Legal Heir of Late Shanti Kumar Aggarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Pratishtha Images Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 Delhi
- Indo Greenfuel Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi & Ors
- Sunoj Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Tarun Kumar Sahay v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Shanti Kumar Agarwal Huf v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Vikas Wahi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 26, Delhi and Ors
- Anuj Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Ors
- Alka Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-28, Delhi
- Betsy Growth Finance Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 & Ors
- Jagmohan Kejriwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1), Delhi & Anr
- Mahabir Parshad Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 43(1), Delhi & Anr
- Susheel Jain v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Vikas Wahi v. Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax Central Circle 26, Delhi and Ors
- Pratishtha Images Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 Delhi
- Pack Plast -India- Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 19-3, Delhi and Anr
- Alankit Finsec Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28 Delhi
- Pratishtha Images Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central-1 v. Ojjus Medicare Pvt. Ltd
- Kapareva Development Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle - 28, Delhi & Ors
- Sunoj Engineers Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Naresh Mittal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43(6) Delhi & Ors
- Pack Plast -India- Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 19-3, Delhi & Anr
- Alankit Forex India Limited v. Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Mohan Kumar Garg v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28, Delhi
- Ashutosh Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi Ors
- Sakshi Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-28, Delhi
- Ankit Agarwal -Legal Heir of Late Shanti Kumar Aggarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Naresh Mittal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43(6) Delhi & Ors
- Kapareva Development Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle - 28, Delhi & Ors
- Saksham Investor Services Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22-1, New Delhi & Anr
- Kapareva Development Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle - 28, Delhi & Ors
- Mahabir Parshad Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 43(1), Delhi & Anr
- New Wave Realtors Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 18(3), Delhi & Anr
- Shashi Garg v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle- 28, Delhi & Anr
- Subodh Kant Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1) Delhi & Anr
- Vivek Garg v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Ashwani Kumar Gupta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 17, & Anr
- Subodh Kant Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1), Delhi & Anr
- Vivek Garg v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Alankit Insurance Tpa Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Alka Agarwal v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Alankit Finsec Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Alankit Finsec Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- New Wave Realtors Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Vinod Kumar Maheshwari v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Mahabir Parshad Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 43(1), Delhi & Anr
- Saksham Commodities Limited v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 22-1, New Delhi & Anr
- Mamta Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi & Ors
- Mamta Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi & Anr
- Tina Organics Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -28
- Jagmohan Kejriwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1), Delhi & Anr
- Jagmohan Kejriwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1), Delhi & Anr
- Vinod Kumar Maheshwari v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Vineeta Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 46(4) Delhi and Anr
- Vineeta Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 46(4 )& Anr
- Subodh Kant Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 28(1) Delhi & Anr
- Alankit Insurance Brokers Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Tarun Kumar Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43(1), Delhi & Anr
- Mamta Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi & Anr
- Alka Agarwal v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Alankit Forex India Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Ashutosh Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28,
- New Wave Realtors Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Ankit Agarwal -Legal Heir of Late Shanti Kumar Aggarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 27, Delhi & Anr
- Tina Organics Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -28
- Vikas Promoters Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Alankit Insurance Tpa Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 28, Delhi
- Alankit Insurance Brokers Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Alankit Insurance Brokers Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Tarun Kumar Sahay Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43(1), Delhi & Anr
- Pack Plast -India- Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 19-3, Delhi & Anr
- Vikas Wahi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 26, Delhi and Ors
- Vinod Kumar Garg v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Vikas Promoters Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Mahabir Parshad Gupta v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 43-1, New Delhi & Anr
- Jagmohan Kejriwal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 62(1), Delhi & Anr
- Tarun Kumar Sahay v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Anuj Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Ors
- Shanti Kumar Agarwal Huf v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi & Anr
- Ashutosh Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Central Circle) 28 Delhi Ors
- Vikas Surya Developers Priavte Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle-28, Delhi & Anr
- Indo Greenfuel Private Limited v. Assitant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle -28, Delhi & Ors
- T Arun Kumar Saha Y Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward 43-1, Delhi & Anr
- Vinod Kumar Garg v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Anuj Sharma v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi & Ors
- Pack Plast -India- Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 19-3, Delhi & Anr
- Alankit Forex India Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Vikas Wahi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 26, Delhi and Ors
- Wg.Commander P.S.Binder Retd v. D.D.A
- Alankit Insurance Tpa Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 28, Delhi
- Manu Gupta v. Sujata Sharma & Ors
- Commissioner of Income Tax 5 Mumbai v. M/S. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. Through Its Manager
- Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-1, New Delhi v. Vatika Township Private Limited
- Securities and Exchange Board of India v. Ajay Agarwal
- Union of India and Ors. v. M.V. Valliappan and Ors.
- Tatavarthi Rajah and Anr. v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Hyderabad
- The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Lucknow v. Maharani Raj Laxmi Devi
- Income Tax Officer, Calicut v. Smt. N.K. Sarada Thampatty