- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 20 November 1995
- Bench
- K. Ramaswamy, B. L. Hansaria
- Result
- Appeal allowed.
Headnote
Service Law:
Regulmisation-Similarly situated persons already regularised-Appel-lant to be taken into se1vice and regularised-However, he will not be entitled to back wages but shall get all other consequential benefits.
In this appeal against the High Court's order, the appellant prayed for regularisation.
Allowing the appeal, this Court HELD : 1. Since the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised, the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position. On this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief. [482-B]
2. The respondents are directed to take the appellant int9 service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order. But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. [ 482-C)
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
In view of the order passed by this Court in S.L.P. (C) Nos. 3099-3100/85 & batch, the persons similarly situated were admittedly taken into service and their services have been regularised. Under these circumstan-ces, since the appellant, who is the only person left out in the field, also stands in the same position, we think, on this special circumstances, he is also entitled to the same relief.
The appeal is accordingly allowed. But the appellant would not be entitled to the back-wages; he would, however, get all other consequential benefits. The respondents are directed to take the appellant into service within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of this order.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 11401 of 1995.
From the Judgment and Order dated 8.9.92 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in RS.A. No. 1065 of 1992.
Appearances
S.M. Hooda, Mahinder Singh Dahiya for the Appellant.
Ms. Suruchi Aggarwal and Ms. lndu Malhotra for the Respondents.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.