VoxJuris
Home › 1996 › Supreme Court of India

Municipal Commitiee, Abohar v. Regional Commissioner, E.S.I. Corpn. and Anr.

Appeal(s) allowed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
2 February 1996
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, G. B. Pattanaik
Result
Appeal allowed.

Headnote

Labour laws :

Employee's State Insurance Act, 1948 :

S.45-A-Employees of Municipal Corporati01t-Working in water works department-Provided with health schem~Eligible to medical facilities and reimbursement of amounts spent-Therefore coverage of the employees under the Act is per se illegal.

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

Leave granted.

This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dated 5.10.1993 in F.A.O. No. 589/93 dismissing the appeal as usual in limine. The admitted facts are that the appellant-Municipal Committee has been running water works known as Patel Water Works. The employees working in the Water Department are now sought to be covered under the provisions of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short 'the Act'). When notice was issued to the appellant, they objected to the coverage of employees under the Act. Therefore, an order has been passed under Section 45-A of the Act. Challenging thereto, an appeal was filed under Section _75 of the Act. The insurance Court has confirmed that the employees are covered under the Act. Accordingly, · when challenged, the high Court in the first appeal dismissed the same. Thus this appeal by special leave.

The question is whether the employees of the Municipal Corporation are also covered under the Act? The employees of the Corporation are governed by the statutory rules made under the Act and in some cases in other States the benefits of the Govt. scales of pay etc. have been extended. However, the fact remains that they are provided with the health scheme and also eligible to medical facilities and reimbursement of the ·amounts spent by the 1 concerned employees. Under these circumstances, the coverage of e_mployees under the Act per se illegal.

I The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.

/

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3508 of 1996.

From the Judgment and Order dated 5.10.93 of the Punjab & Haryana High Court in F.A.O. No. 589 of 1993.

Appearances

P.N. Puri for the Appellant.

V.K. Mehta for the Respondents.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.