- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 9 February 1996
- Bench
- K. Ramaswamy, G. B. Pattanaik
- Result
- Appeal disposed of.
Headnote
Subsidy-Grant of-{]nder the scheme-Applications made on or before September 30, 1988 substantially complying with the requirements enumerated in the guidelines issued by Govemment of India-To be considered and dis-posed of for granting subsidy as per scheme-Matter remitted to the Govem-ment-The Committee constituted in that behalf to examine and dispose it of in the light of the law aid down by Supreme Court in :
Union of India v. Aarbee Pipe & Profiles & Ors., dated February 1, 1996; Umesh Textile & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., dated December 5, 1995 and State of M.P. v. Agro Engineering (MP) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., dated November 1, 1995.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
Delay Condoned.
Leave granted.
There are three orders passed by this Court : in Union of India v. Aarbee Pipe & Profiles & Ors., dated February 1, 1996 by a Bench of three Judges ; Umesh Textile & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr., dated December 5, 1995 by a Bench of two Judges and State of M.P. v. Agro Engineering (MP) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., dated November 1, 1995 by a Bench of two Judges. The substratum of the directions in all those cases is that if the applications are made on or before September 30, 1988 substantially complying·with the requirements enumerated in the guidelines issued by the Government of India, they would be considered and disposed of for granting subsidy as per the scheme. The same should be the order in this case. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. The matter is remitted to the Government and the Committee constituted in that behalf would examine the case and dispose it pf in the light of the law laid down by this Court. No costs.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 3625 of 1996.
From the Judgment and Order dated 25.7.94 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in M.P. No. 1435 of 1990.
K.T.S. Tulsi, Additional Solicitor General, A.S. Rawat and D.S.
Appearances
Mehra for the Appellants.
A.K. Sanghi, N.K. Dabe and Diwakar Chaturvedi for the Respon-dents.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.