VoxJuris
Home › 1996 › Supreme Court of India

Secretary to Government of Andhra Pradesh, Finance and Planning Department and Ors. v. P. Eswar Reddy and Ors.

Appeals allowed.
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
8 January 1996
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, G. B. Pattanaik
Result
Appeals allowed.

Headnote

·

I

Service Law :

Junior LeL:furers in Colleges--Cnmpensatory allowance paid 011 withdraw} of residential attenders discharRing o.fficial work at re~idence-Not discharRing official duties during hnUday.\· a11d leave period-Hence not entitled to co1npensatory allowance during the period o.f holidays and leave.

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

Office report dated January 5, 1996 shows that respondent Nos. 1-83, 86-88, 90 and 93 to 95 have been served. They are not appearing either in person or through counsel. But though notice on respondent Nos. 84, 85, 89, 92 and 96-105 was sent, their acknowledgements have not been received nor any report in that behalf has been sent. Notice must be deemed to have been served on all the respondents.

Leave granted.

In G.0.M.S. No. 105 dated April 3, 1974 of the Finance & Planning (FR.I. & L) Department, it is stated that the orders issued in 0.0.M.S. No. 1059 dated November Jl, 1971 directing sanction of a maximum compensatory allowance@ Rs. 150 [which was later increased to Rs. 200] to the officers from who1n residential attenders withdrawn are to enable such officers to employ a person/persons to attend to the needs of the officers in the discharge of official work at his residence. It was subsequently extended to the Senior and Junior Lecturers working in the colleges. We are concerned with the Junior Lecturers.

The question arose whether. junior lecturers during holidays and leave period are entitled to the payment of compensatory allowance. There was difference of opinion among the two-member Bench of the Tribunal and consequently the matter was placed before a third member. Per majority, it was held that they are entitled to the payment of the allowance during the leave or vacation period. It would be seen that the Lecturers would not perform any official duty during holidays. If at all they have performed duty they would evaluate the examination papers for which they would be paid the· amount for evaluating the papers. Under these circumstances, the majority members were not right in concluding that they arc discharging the official duties during the vacation or leave period and they are entitled to the compensatory allowance. The said decision of the tribunal is accordingly set aside. The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 1924-2015 of IW6.

From the Judgment and Order dated 17.6.91113.8.91 of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad in 0.A. Nos. 21846-21928/90 and R.P. Nos. 19962-70 of 1989.

Appearances

K. Ram Kumar C. Balasubramaniam, T. V.S.N. Chari and Ms. Asha Nair for the appellants.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.