- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 9 January 1996
- Bench
- K. Ramaswamy, G. B. Pattanaik
- Result
- Appeal allowed.
Headnote
Larul Acquisition Act, I 894 :
Compensation and other benefits-Held, convered by earlier decisior>- Party being benefiicary entitled to be impleaded in the pending proceedings b~fore the Sub-Judge.
UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parisad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors., JT (1994) 7 SC 304, held applicable.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
Leave granted.
Though notice was served on the respondents, no one has appeared for the first respondent-claimant. The controversy is no longer res-integra. They are covered by the judgment of this Court in UP. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Gyan Devi (Dead) by Lrs. & Ors., JT (1994) 7 SC 304. In that view, the appellant being beneficiary is entitled to be impleaded as a party in the pending proceedings in the court of Subordinate Judge, Angul.
The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 2239 of 1996. From the Judgment and Order dated 11.3.93 of the Orissa High Court in C.R. No. 72 of 1992.
Appearances
Ashok Kr. Gupta for the Appellant.
Ms. Kirti Misra for the Respondents The f?llowing Order of the Court was delivered :
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.