VoxJuris
Home › 1996 › Supreme Court of India

C.S. Balan and Ors. v. Chief General Manager, Telecom and Ors.

Disposed of
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
26 April 1996
Bench
G. N. Ray, B. L. Hansaria
Result
Appeal disposed of.

Headnote

Service Law :

Promotion-To the post of Junior Telecommunication Officer from out of quota-Vacancies availabl&-Not promoted-Central Administrative Tribunal 11ot goi11g into that questio11-011ly orderi11g that seniority be given-Matter remitted to Tribunal for considering the claim of appella11ts to get promotion from earlier date.

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. The appellant's grievance is that before the General Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, the appellants sought for a declaration that they were entitled to be promoted w.e.f. December, 1990 to the post of Junior Telecom Officer because vacancies in the quota, in which they were entitled to be promoted, were available. It, however, appears from the impugned order that the question of the appellants' entitlement to get promotion has not been gone into, but the application has been disposed of by noting the concession of the respondent that the appellants would be given due seniority. Since the claim for promotion is also required to be considered, we allow this appeal and remit the matter to the Tribunal for consideration of the claim of the appellants to get promotion from earlier date as sought to be agitated in the application presented before the Tribunal. In the facts of the case. it is directed that such consideration be made by the Tribunal after hearing the parties within four months from the date of communication of this order. The appeal is accordingly disposed of with no order as to cost.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No. 8907/96. From the Judgment and order dated 28.11.94/2.12.94 of Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam in O.A. No. 1327/93.

Appearances

G. Prakash for the Appellants.

V.R. Reddy, Additional Solicitor General, Hemanshu Sharma and C.V.S. Rao for the Respondents.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.