VoxJuris
Home › 1998 › Supreme Court of India

Central Board of Secondary Education v. Nikhil Gulati and Anr.

Dismissed
Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
13 February 1998
Bench
M. M. Punchhi, B. N. Kirpal, M. Srinivasan
Result
Petitions dismissed.

Headnote

Education-In eligible students-Permission to undertake examinations under Court orders-Deprecation of-Instance of such aberrations should not be treated as a precedent-Such casual directions by Court is abuse of process-Unless justified High Court should desid from making such orders-He/d no interference was called for under Article 136.

Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.

Judgment

.r Occasional aberrations such as these, whereby ineligible students are

permitted, under court orders, to undertake Board and/or University examinations, have caught the attention of this Court many a time. To add to it further, the courts have almost always observed that the instance of such aberrations should not be treated as a precedent in future. Such casual discretions by the Court is nothing but an abuse of the process; more so when the High Court at its level itself becomes conscious that the decision was wrong and was not worth repeating as a precedent. And yet it is repeated time and again. Having said this much, we hope and trust that unless the High Court can justify its decision on principle and precept, it should better desist from passing such orders for it puts the 'Rule of Law' to a mockery and promotes rather the 'Rule of Man'.

All the same, fond hopes were raised in the minds of the students, herein. Therefore, we decline to interfere wider Article 136 of the Constitution. The S.L.Ps. are, accordingly, dismissed.

Case details

Arising from

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Special Leave Petition (c) No. 18853/1997.

From the Judgment and Order dated 4.9.97 of the Rajasthan High Court in DBCSA 1181 of1997.

Appearances

T.C. Sharma, Neelam Shanna, Mr. Ajay Shanna and Mr. Rupesh Kumar for the Petitioner.

S. K. Jain and Mr.AP. Dhamija for the Respondents.

Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.