Saira @ Ruhi v. Athar Abbas

":.: .... DR. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. 1. Though the present transfer petition has been filed for transfer of a case, the matter was directed to be listed at the Supreme Court Lok Adalat wt\lth was held on 5th September, 2008. With the assistance m tlie Mediators, the parties were heard and following terms for set-tling the disputes were arrived at:

¶1Parties have agreed to withdraw their respective

complaints and suits.

¶2Parties have been living together since 1. 7 .2008. 3. Parties agree that they need counselling to avoid

violence which will be provided by Delhi High Court Mediation Centre. They agree to appear before the

[DR. ARIJIT PA$AYAT, J.]

Delhi High Court Mediation Centre on a date fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶4In order that parties have more confidence in each

other, the parties desire that FIR No.404 of 2007, P.S. Geeta Colony, pending in the Court of Ms. Neerja Bhatia, M.M. Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, may be ~--i quashed.

¶5Petitioner withdraw her petition u/s 125 Cr.P.C.

pending before Ms. Neerja Bhatia, M.M. Karkardooma Courts.

¶6Respondent withdraw his Suit No.321 of 2007

pending before Civil Judge, Jr. Division, Hapur, U.P. 7. Petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. 1232/02/2007

and Civil Suit for restitution being Suit 321/2007 pending before Civil Judge, Hapur, U.P. stand withdrawn.

¶2Orders be sent to the respective courts. Parties are di-rected to appear before ttie Delhi High Court Mediation Centre for counselling on 4.12.2008.

¶3In view of the aforesaid agreement, the petition is dis-posed of on the terms as set out above. The proceedings as noted above stan~ closed.

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Transfer Petition (C) No. 25 of 2008 ...

Rukshana Choudhary and Indira Unninayer for the Appel-lant.