- Court
- Supreme Court of India
- Decided
- 13 May 2011
- Bench
- Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
- Result
- Petition disposed of.
Headnote
Rent control and eviction:
Eviction order - Tenant's appeal dismissed by Supreme Court - Tenant granted nine months time from the date of dismissal of appeal to vacate the tenanted premises - Tenant did not vacate the tenanted premises even after the period ·I granted - Contempt petition - Supreme Court disposed of the contempt petition directing eviction of tenant by police force - Contempt of Court.
Headnote as published in the Digital Supreme Court Reports by the Supreme Court of India. Paragraph references point to the judgment below.
Judgment
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
In this cas~. the tenant's appeal being Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004 was dismissed by this Court by our order dated November 04, 2009 and we gave the tenant nine months' time from that date to vacate the premises in question. Review Petition filed by the tenant was also dismissed on March 25, 2010. I
We are informed that the tenant has not vacated the premises in question. Hence, this contempt petition.
Accordingly, we direct that the tenant-Anderson Wright & Co. shall be evicted from 7, Red Cross Place, P.S. Hare Street, Kolkata-700 001 forthwith by police force.
The Contempt Petition is disposed of.
Case details
Arising from
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Contempt Petition No. 139 of 2011.
h Civil Appeal No. 2663 of 2004.
From the Judgment & Order dated 12.3.2004 of the High Court Calcutta in F.A.No. 23 of 2000.
Appearances
Jaideep Gupta, Sarad Kumar Singhania for the Appellant Ramesh Singh (for O.P. Khaitan & Co) for the Respondent.
Source: Supreme Court of India, Digital Supreme Court Reports, via the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open dataset (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.