VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Delhi High Court 2022 › High Court of Delhi

Shailender Singh @ Sonu v. The State NCT of Delhi

Court
High Court of Delhi
Decided
26 July 2022
Bench
Talwant Singhauthor
Case no.
BAIL APPLN. 1019/2022

Judgment

TALWANT SINGH, J JULY 26, 2022 nk

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Case details

Parties and counsel

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order pronounced on 26.07.2022 + BAIL APPLN. 1019/2022 SHAILENDER SINGH @ SONU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Vardhan Sharma, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N.S. Bajwa, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Talwant Singh, J.: 1. The petitioner has moved this bail application in case FIR No.613/2019 under Sections 365/302/376//392/411/201/34 IPC registered at PS Paschim Vihar West, Delhi. 1.1 He is stated to be in JC since 29.01.2020. It has been submitted that when the petition was filed at that stage charges were yet to be framed. The prosecution has cited 24 prosecution witnesses and out of which none of the witness is such which could be influenced or tampered with by the petitioner. 1.2 The regular bail filed before the learned ASJ was dismissed on 19.01.2022. The bail has been prayed on the ground that more than 2 years and 3 months had passed but the trial is yet to begin; petitioner is in custody since the date of his arrest and charges are yet to be framed; the entire case of the prosecution is based on circumstantial evidence and disclosure statements; the petitioner was arrested on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused Harpreet Singh; there is no CCTV footage or mobile phone location which connects the present petitioner with the alleged offence; there is nothing on record to show that the petitioner had committed the murder, the car recovered by the prosecution has no finger prints or chance prints of the petitioner; the prosecution has stated that one trolley bag allegedly belonging to the deceased has been recovered from his home but there is no witness to the said recovery; another allegation is that the petitioner had given the mobile phone to his girl friend and she has admitted the same in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. but again there is no recovery witness; the prosecution case is based on surmises and conjectures; the petitioner is not directly concerned with the witnesses, investigation of the matter is complete and the petitioner is no longer required for any further investigation, 'Bail is the 'Rule' and Jail is an exception'; there is no previous involvement of the present petitioner; petitioner belongs to a respectable family and is a permanent resident of the address given in the petition, which has been verified, hence there is no chance of his absconding or fleeing from justice and he shall appear on every date before the Court. 2. Notice was issued. Status report has been filed. It has been submitted that on 19.11.2019 a complaint was lodged regarding missing report in respect of Ms. Narinder Kaur, aged 59 years, at PS Paschim Vihar West, Delhi mentioning therein that she had left for Amritsar on 06.11.2019 in her car along with an unknown driver. She was in contact with the complainant till 12.11.2019 on her mobile number but her mobile phone was switched off on 13.11.2019. On 14.11.2019, some unknown person attended the call of the complainant and informed the location of the victim at Kartarpur Gurudwara. On 30.12.2019, in furtherance of the missing report, complainant alleged that Ms. Narinder Kaur was abducted and missing, so an FIR No. 613/2019 under Section 365 IPC was registered at PS Paschim Vihar West and investigation was taken up. It was found that the hand set of the missing person was used by someone with a new mobile number and the said SIM was issued in the name of one Harpreet Singh. The abandoned car of the victim was recovered on 07.01.2020 at GT Raod, near Rajasthan Feeder Canal, Punjab. On 20.01.2020, one of the accused namely Harpreet Singh was arrested at Punjab, who disclosed that he along with his friend, applicant/accused had abducted, robbed and murdered the victim and thereafter they had disposed of the dead body. 2.1 The applicant was arrested on 29.01.2020. During investigation, the trolley bag of the victim was recovered from him. The accused/applica

Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.