- Court
- High Court of Delhi
- Decided
- 26 July 2022
- Bench
- Talwant Singh
- Case no.
- BAIL APPLN. 627/2022
Judgment
TALWANT SINGH, J JULY 26, 2022 nk
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Case details
Parties and counsel
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order pronounced on 26.07.2022 + BAIL APPLN. 627/2022 PARVEEN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Adv. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. N.S. Bajwa, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH Talwant Singh, J.: 1. This is a first regular bail application of petitioner Parveen in case FIR No. 197/2020 under Sections 21/29/61/85 NDPS Act of PS Crime Branch. 1.1 She is stated to be in JC since 17.12.2020. It has been further submitted that FIR was registered on the complaint of complainant namely SI Arvind Kumar, police station Narcotic Cell/Crime Branch on receipt of secret information from the secret informer on 17.12.2020 at about 4.00 p.m. that one person namely Pappu, who is living at Old Delhi Railway Station, who used to supply the smack in bulk quantity in Delhi and NCR, would supply the smack in large quantity at Rama Road, Moti Nagar, Delhi at about 6.00 or 6.30 p.m.. This information was conveyed to SHO Manohar Singh at 4.15 p.m., and it was further conveyed to the ACP/Narcotics Cell Sanjeev Kumar at 4.30 p.m. on which ACP/Narcotic had directed to conduct the raid. A raid party was formed, which left for the spot along with the secret informer. Raiding party reached at the spot at 6.30 p.m. 4-5 persons were asked to join the investigation but they refused to join. One person was found coming from the side of Pahwa Hyundai Motor Road and he stood on the footpath opposite to the transformer and he was waiting for someone there. After 4-5 minutes one lady from the railway line side, who was carrying a black colour polythene in her right hand, stopped near the person who was standing near the transformer. 1.2 After talking to each other for some time, the said Pappu gave one polythene packet to the said lady and the lady handed over a black colour polythene to him and when both were leaving, they were apprehended/overpowered by the members of the raiding party. Again 4-5 persons were asked to join the proceedings but they refused to do so. The name of the apprehended person was revealed as Gulbabu @ Pappu and the name of the lady was revaled as Parveen. 1.3 ACP Narcotic Cell was briefed. IO briefed Gulbabu @ Pappu about his legal rights to be searched before any gazetted officer/Magistrate. Notice under Section 50 of NDPS Act was prepared in this regard. Gulbabu @ Pappu refused to call any Magistrate and Gazetted Officer on the spot. Similarly, Parveen was informed about her legal rights and notice under Section 50 NDPS was prepared and she refused to call any Magistrate or Gazetted Officer at the spot. ACP arrived at the spot at about 9.30 p.m. and he made enquiries from both the persons and after satisfying himself, he directed the IO to carry out the search of both the persons in his presence. A lady constable conducted the search of the present applicant and there was recovery of transparent polythene from the right hand of the present applicant, in which powder of brown colour was kept. 1.4 On testing the same, it was found to be heroin and the weight of the same was found to be of 150 gms. Similarly, search of Gulbabu @ Pappu was conducted and a polythene was recovered from his hand in which there were four bundles of Rs. 500/- denomination notes and one bundle of Rs. 100/- denomination notes, the total currency recovered comes to Rs. 2,20,000/- and the same was seized. 1.5 On the basis of the above, the present FIR was registered; charge- sheet was filed in Court; the interim bail moved by the petitioner was allowed on the ground that the daughter of the present petitioner was pregnant and there was nobody to look after her; the accused surrendered after the expiry of the interim bail and then moved an application for regular bail, which was dismissed on 07.01.2022. Hence the present petition has been filed. 1.6 The petitioner has prayed for regular bail on the ground that she is innocent; she has been falsely implicated; the
Source: High Court of Delhi, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.