Vikrant Singh Gangwar v. Punjanb National Bank

order."

¶11The other terms and conditions of the appointment makes it very clear that the Appointment Order so issued was provisional in nature subject to verification of the certificates relating to educational qualification and work experience. The respondent bank issued another order on 23.04.2021 and the Appellant was directed to submit necessary documents in respect of qualifications and work experience. The letter dated 23.04.2021 reads as follows: Human Resources Management Department (Under Human Resource Division) Plot No.4, Sec-10 Dwarka, New Delhi-110075 Recruitmentho@pnb.co.in Date:-23-04-2021 REGISTERED/SPEED POST 1931000612 MR. VIKRANT SINGH GANGWAR S/0 MR. MUKESH KUMAR GANGWAR MOH.CHAPATTI PATELPURAM KAIMGANJ

FARRUKHABAD UTTAR PRADESH -209502 vikrantkmj@gmail.com Sir/Madam, Reg.: Your appointment for the post of Manager (Risk) in MMG Scale· II This is in reference to our letter dated 05.03.2021 on the captioned subject, vide which you were informed about your provisional selection for the post of Manager (Risk) in our Bank in response to your application, subsequent written test and Interview on the terms and conditions mentioned therein. It was mentioned in the offer letter dated 05.03.2021 that your appointment is provisional subject to meeting, inter alia, the following criterion apart from other terms and conditions mentioned therein: a) Meeting the eligibility criteria as prescribed under Bank's notification dated 07.09.2020. b) Submission of required valid educational and professional qualification certificates as specified in your application and require experience certificate (wherever applicable), acceptable to the Bank. In this regard, it is observed that: · Essential educational qualification for the post of Manager (Risk) was prescribed as Bachelor/Master in Math/Statistics/Economics/ or FRM/PRM/DTIRM/MBA (Finance)*/CA/ICWA/CFA/PGPBF minimum of 60% in aggregate as per the advertisement/notification dated 07.09.2020. However, at the time of interview in support of minimum educational qualification, the following documents have been submitted: > PGDM Degree Certificate ( without specialization as Finance) · Essential Post qualification work experience & other stipulations for the post of Manager (Risk) were prescribed as Minimum 1 year of post-

qualification experience in Banks/PSU/Corporate High Value Credit/ NBFC in relevant field as per the advertisement/notification dated 07.09.2020. However, at the time of interview in support of minimum post qualification work experience, the following documents have been submitted: > Certificate from SBI (Contractual employment) On scrutiny of documents, it is observed that you have pursued PGDM (without specialization as Finance) which does not meet/support minimum desired educational qualification for the captioned post. Also the post qualification work experience does not meet/support the desired work experience in the relevant field. As such you are advised to submit copies of aforesaid necessary documents/certificates to satisfy the Bank that you possess necessary essential educational qualifications and necessary post qualification work experience as notified for the post of Manager (Risk) as per advertisement within 15 days of receipt of this letter in order to consider your candidature. You are advised to take note that if we do not receive the desired documents/certificates establishing your minimum educational qualification and post qualification work experience required for confirming your eligibility for the post Manager (Risk) within the stipulated time, we shall be constrained to cancel your candidature without any further notice to you. Yours sincerely, (R.K. BAJPAI) DY. GENERAL MANAGER

¶12The Appellant did submit a reply to the aforesaid communication and in respect of work experience, the Appellant's communication reveals that he has furnished the following details in respect of work experience: "2. Work experience: -

As the essential experience mentioned in the advertisement was minimum 1 year post qualification experience in Banks, I applied for the post since I didn"t want to miss an opportunity to work for PNB in this role. I have been working with the State Bank of India since 1 July, 2017 on contractual basis as a full-time employee in the Performance, Planning and Review (PPR) department reporting to General Manager (PPR). As per the policy of the State Bank of India (SBI), work experience certificate is issued at the time of relieving but they had issued me a No-Objection Certificate which I had submitted as a proof of association with SBI along with the copy of contract. I was advised to clarify the contractual nature of employment, I request you to consider following points in this regard:-  My contract with SBI is not a third party contract like other PSBs where third party contracts are signed for the work force mainly to sell non-banking financial products.  As such, I am a regular employee of State Bank of India (SBI Identity Card attached for your reference) without any lien to any other organization (not even subsidiaries of SBI) and my salary is being paid by SBI from the "Head" Staff expenses (Salary slips attached for your reference) and not Operating Expense.  I can only be allotted the work profile of a Banker like other officers of SBI recruited through SBI PO and governed by similar terms & conditions. My engagement with SBI is not like that of Call Centre Employees / Collection agents whose performance is governed by SLA (Service Level Agreement) / recovery targets. In fact, I am privy to the Price Sensitive Financial information of the State Bank of India much before it is disclosed in public and have to sign non-disclosure documents for SEBI like any other employees.  My appraisal is done by the General Manager (PPR) and approved by Chief General Manager of SBI based on my performance and not governed by any SLA.

 SBI has recruited fresh students from premier institutes to bring in efficiency in the specialized departments besides reducing staff expenses and recruits have been given profiles at par with any officer (Scale-2-5).  Brief profile: - I have worked in Investor Relations (Maintain external credit rating with proper communication with Rating Agencies, meeting Investors etc.), assisted Capital Desk (Capital Planning at SBI (solo) & SBI (Consolidated) as per Besel Pillar I) and coordinating the implementing of EASE Reforms of IBA in SBI and giving inputs to Top Management including Chairman (as a part of department)  In view of the above-mentioned points, I wish to state that my experience in SBI is at par with any other regular employee in any PSBs or Pvt. Sector Banks and hence request you to consider my candidature for the post."

¶13The Respondents have further taken into account the reply submitted by the Petitioner and withdrawn the provisional Offer of Appointment dated

05.03.2021 for the post of Manager (Risk) by issuing a communication dated 20.09.2021.

¶14The undisputed facts of the case make it very clear that as per Note

(A) which has been reproduced earlier, the work experience, past qualification in the relevant field as a full-time and permanent employee was required and it is mandatory qualification as per the advertisement issued for the post in question.

¶15Meaning thereby, the experience required was as a full-time and permanent employee and the documents submitted by the Appellant make it very clear that he was not a permanent employee or a full-time employee of the State Bank of India.

¶16In those circumstances, the bank has passed the order dated

20.09.2021 rightly holding that the Appellant does not fulfill the requisite post qualification work experience as prescribed in the advertisement dated

07.09.2020 and, therefore, the learned Single Judge was justified in dismissing the Writ petition. This Court also does not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by the learned Single Judge and the LPA is, accordingly, dismissed.

SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J. AUGUST 16, 2022 N.Khanna

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 16.08.2022 % LPA 458/2021 and C.M. No.42944/2021 VIKRANT SINGH GANGWAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sharique Hussain, Advocate. versus PUNJANB NATIONAL BANK ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam, Mr.Anant Gautam, Mr. Nipun Sharma, Mr.Sachin Singh & Mr. Vidur Ahluwalia, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ. (ORAL) 1. The present Letters Patent Appeal has been filed under Clause 10 of Letters Patent Appeal against the order dated 21.10.2021 passed in W.P.(C.) No. 11823/2021, titled Vikrant Singh Gangwar v. Punjab National Bank and Anr. 2. The facts of the case reveal that the Punjab National Bank issued an advertisement on 07.09.2020 inviting applications for the post of Manager (Risk) in various disciplines and the post of Manager (Risk) was included in the advertisement. The appellant applied in response to the advertisement and appeared in the written examination. 3. The appellant also qualified the written examination and was called for an interview and finally an offer of appointment was issued on 05.03.2021. The offer of appointment was provisional subject to the appellant meeting the eligibility criteria as provided under the advertisement dated 07.09.2020. The Respondent bank, on 23.04.2021 directed the petitioner to submit necessary documents/ certificates in order to establish that he holds the qualifications and work experience and the appellant did submit a reply on 15.05.2021. The Respondent bank has finally passed an order on 20.09.2021 communicating to the Appellant – by which the Offer of Appointment dated 05.03.2021 to the post of Manager (Risk) has been cancelled. 4. The Appellant by filing a Writ Petition did assail the order dated 20.09.2021 and prayed for appointment/ reinstatement as Manager (Risk) and the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition. 5. The Order passed by the learned Single Judge, in paragraphs 9,10 and 11 reads as under: "9. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, the only issue which arises for consideration is whether the withdrawal of the offer of appointment dated March 5, 2021 of the petitioner as Manager (Risk) in the respondent Bank in terms of communication dated September 20, 2021 is justified. 10. The advertisement issued by the respondent Bank on September 7, 2020, the relevant clauses which have been highlighted above, more specifically Note "A", clearly reveals that the experience for the Manager (Risk) post must be qualifications in the "relevant field" and he should be a full time and a permanent employee. The offer of appointment dated March 5, 2021 issued to the petitioner clearly reveals that the same is subject to the petitioner meeting the eligibility conditions for the post in question. The respondent Bank before taking the impugned action had called upon the petitioner to submit the copies of the necessary documents / certificates to satisfy the Bank that he possesses the necessary educational qualifications and post qualification work experience. In response thereto, the petitioner had submitted his response vide letter dated May 15, 2021. The work experience, which I have already reproduced above do throw light that his experience in the State Bank of India was primarily in the performance, planning and review department reporting to the General Manager (PPR) Surely, the performance planning review department is not similar to the Risk department for which the petitioner has submitted the application. Though a submission is made by Mr. Khan that while performing his duties in the PPR Department, petitioner was performing duties related to Risk Management, I am unable to agree with the said submission. It is the satisfaction of the Bank which is important and this Court cannot substitute the decision of the Bank with its own decision until and unless the decision is palpably perverse without any basis. T