- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Case no.
- WPIL 2043/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2043 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Mali Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Muktesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J. Heard Shri Muktesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Tarun Gaur, learned standing counsel for the state respondents. On previous occasion at the admission stage vide order dated 13.9.2023 time was granted for filing Supplementary AfÏdavit to meet the requirement as contemplated under Sub Rule (3-A) of Rule 1 of Chapter XXII of the Allahabad High Court Rules (Rules of the Court 1952) and again on 26.9.2023 time was extended in favour of the learned counsel for the petitioner for filing Supplementary afÏdavit. Today when the matter is taken up, again time has been sought for filing Supplementary afÏdavit, whereas learned standing counsel came up with the instructions that the proceedings against the alleged illegal encroachers have already been initiated under Section 67 of the Code of 2006 and the same is taken on record. In pursuance to the instructions so received there is hardly any cause of action survives in favour of the petitioner to pursue the instant petition, once the proceedings have already been initiated against the alleged encroachers under section 67 of the Code of 2006. Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.