- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 11 October 2023
- Case no.
- CRLP 16103/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 43 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16103 of 2023 Petitioner :- Surya Kant Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Radhey Shyam Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Shiv Shanker Prasad,J. Heard Shri Radhey Shyam Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the respondent no.3, Electricity Board and learned AGA for the State. The writ petition seeks quashing of the first information report dated 26.07.2023 giving rise to Case Crime No.1585 of 2023, under Section 135-1(a) of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2003, Police Station-Fatehgarh (Anti Power Theft), District-Farrukhabad. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner shall apply for compounding before the competent authority as per the provisions of Section 152 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 states that if the petitioner applies for compounding within two weeks from today, his application for compounding shall be considered in accordance with law and appropriate order shall be passed thereon. In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on merits of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to apply for compounding before the competent authority in accordance with law within two weeks from today along with a copy of this order and in the event a compounding application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law within next one week. For a period of three weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Abhishek Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.