VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dharmendra Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
11 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 20837/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20837 of 2023 Petitioner :- Dharmendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Krishna Kant Singh Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Jay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prabhakar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3.

¶2It is the case of the petitioner that being the Manager of Dharm Jyoti Mahavidyalay, Taharpur, District Aligarh, preferred an appeal under Section 67(5) of U.P. Revenue Code against the order dated

29.08.2019 before respondent no.2 and the same has been dismissed vide order dated 15.04.2023 which impugned the present petition.

¶3During pendency of the instant petition, the sole petitioner, namely, Dharmendra Singh expired and till his death, he was discharging all necessary duties being the Manager of Dharm Jyoti Mahavidyalay, Taharpur, District Aligarh. Substitution application has already been preferred which has already been allowed and wife of Late Dharmendra Singh has now been substituted who is not the Manager of the institution.

¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the fate and effect of the orders dated 15.04.2023 passed by respondent no.2 and 29.08.2019 passed by respondent no.3 may be adversely affected the wife of Late Dharmendra Singh, namely Mrs. Bhavana Chaudhary.

¶5Learned Standing Counsel supported the orders which impugned the present petition and also submitted that the entire exercise whatsoever shall be carried out in pursuance to the order passed by respondent nos.2 and 3, shall only be against the institution and not against any particular person, if the institution has been determined as an illegal encroacher over the field pertains to Gram Sabha then whatsoever proceedings shall be initiated for recovery of penalty and removal of encroachment in pursuance of the orders passed under Sections 67 and 67(5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, shall be carried out only against the institution.

¶6After having the rival submissions as extended by learned counsel for both the parties, it is made clear that the respondent no.3 is hereby directed to initiate further action against the institution i.e. Dharm Jyoti Mahavidyalay, Taharpur, District Aligarh in pursuance of the order dated 15.04.2023 which attained finality under Section 67(5) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 by way of removing the illegal encroachment and realizing the penalty.

¶7The present petition stands disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Vivek Kr. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.