Digvijay Kumar Mishra v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35293 of 2023 Petitioner :- Digvijay Kumar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akhilesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.

¶1Heard Sri Akhilesh Singh, learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus to be issued in favour of the respondent no.2 to decide application for mutation proceedings in Suit No.T202205200205064 (Digvijay Kumar Mishra vs. Abdul Bari & others) under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously.

¶3Learned counsel for petitioners submits that grievance of petitioners would sufficiently be met in case, the aforesaid case is considered and decided in a time bound period.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and an appropriate direction may be issued to respondent no.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner.

¶5Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case as well as if there is no other legal impediment available, the respondent no.2 is hereby directed to consider and decide application

for

mutation

proceedings

in

Suit No.T202205200205064 (Digvijay Kumar Mishra vs. Abdul Bari & others) under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of nine months from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to all the effected parties.

¶6With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad