VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Praveen Singh v. State of U.P

Dismissed on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
11 October 2023
Case no.
BAIL 38866/2022

Judgment

Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38866 of 2022 Applicant :- Praveen Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kamala Kant Pandey,Shrawan Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Prakash Patel Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.

¶1Heard Sri Shrawan Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Prakash Patel, learned counsel for the informant and Sri Ravi Kant Kushwaha, learned AGA for the State.

¶2The instant bail application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 432 of 2021, under Sections 304-B, 498-A IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, Police Station Bhojipura, District Bareilly during pendency of the trial.

¶3FIR of the present case was lodged against the applicant and his family members and according to the FIR marriage of the applicant was performed with the deceased on 22.4.2021 and after marriage applicant and family members of the applicant tortured the deceased for dowry and on 9.8.2021 when informant arrived the matrimonial home of the deceased then he found that his daughter i.e. deceased had died.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant submits applicant is husband of the deceased and on the basis of false allegation of demand of dowry and torture, he has been made accused in the present matter.

¶5He further submits that deceased died within four months of her marriage and therefore applicant even could not become aware why she committed suicide. He further submits that post mortem report also suggests that deceased committed sicide as according to the autopsy surgeon, deceased died due to ante mortem hanging.

¶6He further submits that applicant is not having any previous criminal history and he is in jail since 6.9.2021 i.e. for more than two years.

¶7Per contra, learned AGA as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that applicant is husband of the deceased and his wife died within four months of marriage in her matrimonial home and there is also allegation of demand of dowry. They further submit that at the time of death, deceased was also having pregnancy of about three months.

¶8I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record of the case.

¶9Applicant is husband of the deceased and his wife died within four months of marriage in her matrimonial home due to ante mortem hanging and there is also allegation of demand of dowry.

¶10Further, however, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that deceased committed suicide but he failed to provide any reason for her alleged suicide.

¶11Further, from the record, it reflects that at the time of death, deceased was also having about three months pregnancy.

¶12Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances and circumstances of the case discussed above, in my view, applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.

¶13Accordingly, the bail application is rejected.

¶14However, considering the fact that applicant is in jail for more than two years, trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the case within eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order strictly as per provision of Section 309 Cr.P.C. in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Aiman High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.