- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 16359/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16359 of 2023 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Tiwari,Aditi Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikas Budhwar,J. Heard Sri Ramesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manoj Vashishtha, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for respondents 1, 2 and 3. In view of the order, which is being proposed to be passed today, notices are not being issued to the 4th and 5th respondents. By means of the present writ petition the writ petitioner seeks disposal of his representation as according to him the matter with regard to the continuance of the fifth respondent is already ceased with the educational authorities and he seeks to invite the attention of the court towards annexure-9 at page 37 reference whereof in para 15 in that regard. Be that as it may the writ petitioner is at liberty to approach the competent authority in case according to the writ petitioner the matter is pending. The Court has no reason to disbelieve that in case the writ petitioner has any locus and has cause of action then the same would be decided strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 piyush High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.