- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35521/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35521 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suryamani Pathak And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
¶1The instant petition has been filed praying for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to pay compensation to the petitioners for having taken over possession of some part of land of plot No. 336 area 1.5080 Hectare, situated village Govindpur Patti (Bhadohi), Tehsil Ghyanpur, District Bhadohi and decide the application dated 11.09.2023.
¶2The case of the petitioners is that the respondents had taken possession of the aforesaid land without any formal acquisition for widening of certain road without payment of any compensation.
¶3By a previous order, we granted time to learned Standing counsel to obtain instructions. Sri Rajeev Gupta, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel is present on behalf of State-respondents. He states that the respondents have not furnished any instruction to him so far. He submits that the claim of the petitioners can be decided by the Committee in terms of Government Order dated 12.05.2016.
¶4In our opinion, it will sub-serve the ends of justice.
¶5Accordingly, without expressing any opinion of merits, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file fresh representation with true attested copy of the instant order before respondent no.2 within two weeks from today and in which event, he will place the same before the Committee envisaged under Government Order dated 12.05.2016 for being decided in accordance with law, within next twelve weeks by a speaking order after hearing the petitioners. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Mukesh Kr. (Donadi Ramesh,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.