- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35568/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35568 of 2023 Petitioner :- Naresh Chand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shree Prakash Giri Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Mr. Shree Prakash Giri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.C. Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
¶2The petitioner claims to be social worker and resident of District-Agra. He made complaint against respondent nos. 4 and 5 who are the government servant discharging their duties as Collection Amin and Assistant Development Officer (Panchayat) respectively and they have huge property beyond their monthly salary either in their own names or in the name of their family members by misappropriation of their posts in unlawful and illegal manner.
¶3In this backdrop, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition is preferred for a direction from Principal Secretary, Department of Vigilance, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow to conclude the proceedings of investigation on the basis of complaint dated 05.06.2023 against respondent nos. 4 and 5 to its logical end under Section 13(1) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. In support of his submissions, he has also placed reliance upon the judgement passed by the Apex Court in Charan Singh v. State of Maharasthra, 2021 5 SCC 469.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances, without adverting to the merits of the case, needless to say in case, complaint is entertained by the competent authority, definitely the same is to be concluded to its logical end but after giving an opportunity of hearing to the persons against whom alleged allegations are levelled.
¶5With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 13.10.2023/ Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.