Hardesh Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35627 of 2023 Petitioner :- Hardesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶2The present writ petition is preferred for a writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to decide the representation dated 11.09.2023.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is already represented his case through representation but till date, the grievance of the petitioner has not been redressed.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel very fairly submits that, in case, any such representation is pending, the same would be decided by the concerned authority.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending consideration.

¶6Considering the the facts and circumstances, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no. 3 - Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Atrauli, District-Aligarh to consider and decide the petitioner's application/representation dated 11.09.2023 strictly in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Rama Kant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad