- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- A482 35610/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 35610 of 2023 Applicant :- Sukhpal And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Its Secretary Home And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Saurabh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
¶2This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to quash the summoning order dated 3.10.2021 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.)/F.T.C. Court/J.M. Budaun, arising out of complaint case no. 3996 of 2020, under section 504, 323, 324 I.P.C. P.S. Musajhag, District Budaun, Smt. Munni Devi Vs. Sukhpal and others, pending in the court of Civil Judge (J.D.)F.T.C. Court Budaun.
¶3Learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the application and states that the applicants are ready to surrender before the court below and seek their bail and that their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
¶4Per contra, learned A.G.A. has submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the application.
¶5In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today and seek bail, their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application filed u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 R High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.