Sridhar Chaturvedi v. State of U.P. and Anr

Court No. - 81 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9814 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sridhar Chaturvedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Rang Nath Pandey,Rahul Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.

¶1Heard Sri Rang Nath Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri L.D. Rajbhar, learned AGA for the State.

¶2By means of this petition, the petitioner has challenged the summoning order dated 27.04.2019 passed by ACJM-IIIrd, Mathura in complaint case no. 1452 of 2018, by which the petitioner-Sridhar Chaturvedi and 2 others namely, Ganesha and Bhuri were summoned, to face trial under sections 452, 323, 506 IPC and further the order dated 27.11.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mathura in Criminal Revision No. 245 of 2019, by which the revision was dismissed and the court declined to interfere in the summoning order.

¶3During the course of hearing of the instant petition, this court passed an order on 31.05.2023 as below:- "Learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.G.A. for State are present. It is submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that both the parties have entered into compromise. Photo copy of this compromise has been filed. Original compromise has been filed before trial court. Accordingly, it is directed that the parties shall appear before the court below along with a certified copy of this order on the next date fixed and be permitted to file an application for verification of the original compromise document. It is expected that the trial court may fix a date for the verification of the compromise entered into between the parties and pass an appropriate order with respect to the verification within a period of one month from today. Upon due verification, the court below shall send a report to this Court along with verified main compromise paper. List on 25.07.2023. Both the parties shall present at the time of verification of the compromise."

¶4In pursuance of the aforesaid orders, the compromise was verified before the court concerned. A report of the same has been received.

¶5In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a compromise and they do not want to further prosecute their case, the learned trial court is ordered to proceed in the matter, taking into consideration the compromise, and pass an order according to law, within a reasonable time.

¶6This petition is disposed of accordingly. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 #Vikram/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad