Yagya Priya v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 72 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18485 of 2023 Applicant :- Yagya Priya Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sher Bahadur Yadav,Tripurari Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sarvajeet Singh Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶1None is present on behalf of the informant even in the revised call.

¶2Heard Sri Tripurari Pal, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Shakil Ahmad, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶3Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 74 of 2023, under Sections 328, 354, 354Gha, 452 of I.P.C. and Sections 7/8 of POCSO Act, Police Station Zareef Nagar, District Budaun, during the pendency of trial.

¶4As per prosecution story, the daughter of the informant was found in an unconscious state by the informant in the night of 20.02.2023. After much efforts, she gained her consciousness and she has revealed that she has been abducted by the applicant and thrown her from the roof of the house.

¶5Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. There is no injury report to substantiate the prosecution story. The FIR is delayed by about four days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused.

¶6Several other submissions have been made on behalf of the applicant to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against him. The circumstances which, as per counsel, led to the false implication of the applicant have also been touched upon at length. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 25.03.2023. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and also the fact that the applicant has no criminal history.

¶8Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, pending trial and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment, at this stage, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶9Let the applicant-Yagya Priya involved in aforementioned case crime number be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. i. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial. ii. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. iii. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted. iv. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. v. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶10In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶11Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶12It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion on the testimony of the witnesses. (Justice Krishan Pahal) Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Siddhant High Court of Judicature at Allahabad