- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 28329/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28329 of 2023 Petitioner :- Indradev Pal And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Priti Verma,Ram Sajiwan Prajapati,Siya Ram Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri R.M. Upadhyay, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel.
¶2Present writ petition has been preferred for following relief:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the concerned respondent authorities/ Directorate Backward Classes Welfare Department, Uttar Pradesh/respondent no.2 to provide copy of orders and legal action taken against respondent no.6 Smt. Ayasha Begum as well as erring officers concerned who have wrongly provided benefits to the respondent no.6, in compliance of Enquiry Report dated 8.9.2010 conducted by Satarkta Prakoshth Directorate Backward Classes Welfare Department Uttar Pradesh (Annexure No.2 to the writ petition) forthwith or within a stipulated period of time which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper to fix."
¶3After the matter has been heard at some length and the Court has proceeded to indicate its mind to dismiss the writ petition with heavy cost, learned counsel for the petitioners has contended that he does not intend to press the present writ petition.
¶4Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 SP/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.