- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 12 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 27560/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27560 of 2023 Petitioner :- Saurabh Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sharad Chandra Upadhyay, learned Standing Counsel.
¶2Present writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
30.5.2023 and to provide security cover to the petitioner within stipulated period.
¶3On the matter being taken up today, learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of instructions dated 5.9.2023, has submitted that the claim of the petitioner has already been turned down by the District Level Security Committee vide order dated 4.4.2023 and the excess money deposited by the petitioner has also been returned. As such it is submitted that the cause for filing the writ petition no more survives.
¶4In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. The instruction filed by learned Standing Counsel is taken on record. Order Date :- 13.10.2023 SP/ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.