Bhabhooti Yadav v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35379 of 2023 Petitioner :- Bhabhooti Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Navneet Lal Srivastava,Akshay Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

¶2The present writ petition has been filed for expediting the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 being Computerized Case No.T202305470301013 (Gaon Sabha vs. Bathe), within stipulated time.

¶3A preliminary objection has been raised by learned Standing Counsel that petitioner is complainant in the proceedings and he has no locus to file the present petition as he is neither a party to the aforesaid proceedings nor a person aggrieved, therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable.

¶4In view of the above, the present writ petition is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

¶5Since the aforesaid proceedings are pending, it is expected that the same may be decided, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] High Court of Judicature at Allahabad