Yasmeen Farhat v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Court No. - 36 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 14597 of 2023 Petitioner :- Yasmeen Farhat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Prabhakar Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Akanksha Sharma Hon'ble Manjive Shukla,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent No. 1 as well as Smt Akanksha Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents No. 2, 3 and 4.

¶2Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that husband of the petitioner while working on the post of Headmaster in Junior High School, Sahunagla, Block-Moradabad Rural, District Moradabad died on 03.11.2017. Since petitioner was not paid the death-cum-retiral gratuity admissible to her husband, as such, she filed Writ-A No. 21632 of 2022 which was disposed of by this court vide order dated

21.12.2022 in terms of the judgement and order passed by this court in the case of Usha Rani Vs. State of U.P. and 6 others.

¶3Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that petitioner in compliance of the aforesaid order dated 21.12.2022 passed in Writ-A No. 21632 of 2022 has been paid an amount of Rs. 15,85,597.52/- towards gratuity but has not been paid any amount towards interest over the delayed payment of gratuity.

¶4Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has invited attention of this court towards the fact that petitioner has already submitted a representation to the District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad wherein she has prayed that she may be paid interest over the delayed payment of gratuity.

¶5Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has argued that the aforesaid representation is pending before the District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad since 10.08.2023 but the same has not been decided till date.

¶6On the other hand, Smt. Akanksha Sharma, though initially tried to oppose the writ petition but ultimately has consented that the entitlement, of the interest over the delayed payment of gratuity, of the petitioner can very well be seen and adjudicated by the District Basic Education Officer, District Moradabad.

¶7In view of the aforesaid submissions advanced by the learned counsels appearing for the parties, without entering into the merits of the case, this writ petition is finally disposed of with a direction to the District Basic Education Officer, Moradabad to consider and decide the petitioner's representation by passing speaking and reasoned order within a period of two months from the date of service of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 A. Mandhani High Court of Judicature at Allahabad