VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachidanand Singh v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
15 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 24179/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24179 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sachidanand Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramakant Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Harindra Prasad Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and Sri Harindra Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 to 7.

¶2The present writ petition has been preferred for a mandamus commanding the respondent no. 3 to comply with the order dated 22.5.2023 passed by respondent no. 2 within stipulated period. Alternatively, prayer is made to direct the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation dated 24.6.2023 within stipulated period.

¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that as there is dispute between the parties, wherein, certain rights have been derived on the basis of ceiling proceeding under the Uttar Pradesh Imposition of Ceiling on Land Holdings Act, 1960. The contesting-respondent claims certain rights on the basis of some lease. He has placed reliance upon the order dated 9.10.2023 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate Sadar, Mau indicating therein he had constituted a five-member committee for fact finding enquiry and the parties were directed to appear on 11.10.2023 at 10 AM. In this backdrop, he submits that as the proceeding is pending before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, he is not inclined to press the present writ petition but the direction may be issued to the Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned to proceed strictly in accordance with law.

¶4Considering the factual aspect of the matter, as the parties have already appeared before the Sub Divisional Magistrate/competent authority, we are not inclined to proceed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Needless to say, the respondent-Authority must finalise the proceeding in question, strictly in accordance with law but certainly after affording opportunity to all stakeholders in the matter. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 A.K.Srivastava High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.