- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIA 16897/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 16897 of 2023 Petitioner :- Lila Devi @ Leela Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Binod Kumar Vishwakarma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.
¶2By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs: "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Safaie Karmee in Police Station Mugal Sarai, District Chandauli with effect from 21.12.2001 as per the Uttar Pradesh Regularization of Daily Wages (Appointment on Group-D Post) Rules 2001 and provide its consequential benefits, without any further delay; II. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to the respondent no.2 to decide the representation dated 2.7.2023 and regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Safaie Karmee in Police Station Mugal Sarai, District Chandauli with effect from 21.12.2001 as per the Uttar Regularization of Daily Wages (Appointment on Group-D Post) Rules 2001 and provide its consequential benefits, without any further delay;"
¶3Learned Standing Counsel does not have any objection to the above prayer.
¶4In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with direction to the respondent no.2, namely, Superintendent of Police, Chandauli to look into and consider the claim of the petitioner as raised in his representation dated 02.07.2023 and decide the same as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order in the light of the relevant regularization rules. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Deepika High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.