- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35743/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35743 of 2023 Petitioner :- Mohd. Hanif And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Nisheeth Yadav,Ajay Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
¶1Heard Nisheeth Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Harish Chandra Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.
¶2The present petition has been preferred for challenging the impugned notice dated 10.09.2023 passed by respondent no.5 which is in shape of demolishing the house of the petitioners.
¶3At the very outset, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this petition on the ground that the petitioner has an alternative remedy to challenge the impugned notice.
¶4Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition on the ground of alternative remedy.
¶5Accordingly, the present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn on the ground of alternative remedy as available to them in accordance with law. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Rakesh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.