- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35713/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 10 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35713 of 2023 Petitioner :- (Km) Nayanika Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Pratap Singh Raghav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dinesh Chandra Mishra,Pranab Kumar Ganguli Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J.
¶1Heard Sri A.P. Singh Raghav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent no.1 and Sri Dinesh Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents no.2 and 3.
¶2The petitioner claims refund of fees on various grounds and submits that such refund is permissible under the policy of University Grants Commission.
¶3Sri Dinesh Chandra Mishra, learned counsel for the University, refers to letter dated 08.04.2022 issued by the University informing the petitioner about the conditions of refund.
¶4I find that, till today, no decision has been taken in the petitioner's case either accepting or rejecting or partly accepting or partly rejecting the claim for refund and there being factual dispute involved in the case and considering the fact that the petitioner has already represented her cause before the Registrar of the University, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Registrar, Sardar Ballabh Bai Patel University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut (respondent no.3) to consider the petitioner's application and pass a reasoned and speaking order thereon before
15.12.2023.
¶5The petitioner is permitted to submit a certified copy of this order along with fresh application before the respondent no.3 within two weeks from today. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 AKShukla/- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.