Yogesh v. State of U.P

Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29322 of 2023 Applicant :- Yogesh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Laxmi Narayan Rathour Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶2The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Yogesh with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 84 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Rampura, District-Jalaun, during pendency of trial.

¶3There are allegations against the applicant of committing dowry death of his wife and subjecting her to cruelty.

¶4Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. The deceased did not wanted to live with his parents-in-law and used to quarrel with the applicant. She wanted to live separately from her parents-in-law. It is further submitted that there was no allegation of demand of dowry against the applicant or his family members in the F.I.R. but thereafter the informant has given the false statement before the I.O. and alleged that applicant and his family members were demanding of Rs. 1 Lac. It is further submitted that deceased had committed suicide when applicant was not present at home. There is no specific role assigned to the applicant. Charges has also been framed on 9.1.2023 and thereafter date is being fixed for evidence but no prosecution witness has appeared. Learned counsel for the applicant has placed certified copy of the latest order of trial Court. He has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 03.08.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶5Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶7In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶8Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶9The court below is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year.

¶10The Registrar (Compliance) of this Court is directed to communicate this order to the court concerned within 10 days. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 SY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad