- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 30125/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30125 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sri Sakhi Ji Hanuman Mandir Pichhor Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suresh Pratap Singh,Kunwar Abhishek Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard Sri Suresh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Shubhra Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
¶2Sri Sakhi Ji Hanuman Mandir Pichhor, Jhansi through its Manager is before this Court with request to issue direction to the respondents to protect the property of the petitioner temple i.e. plot no.435, Tehsil Sadar, District Jhansi.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner has made a representation before the Commissioner, Jhansi Division, Jhansi on 05.07.2023 for redressal of its grievance, which is still pending. He has confined his prayer only to the relief that the petitioner's representation dated 05.07.2023 may be considered by the appropriate authority.
¶4No useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances, we are not inclined to adjudicate the matter on merits and with consent of the parties, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before respondent no.3, Sub Divisional Officer, District Jhansi ventilating it grievances within two weeks from today and in case any such representation is preferred within the said time, we hope and trust that the same would be looked into, examined and remedied strictly in accordance with law by the third respondent within four weeks from the date of filing of such representation along with a copy of this order. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 S.P. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.