VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sonam Dwivedi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 October 2023
Case no.
WRIA 17039/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 34 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17039 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sonam Dwivedi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Kant Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- CSC Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶2By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged the order dated 11.09.2023 whereby she has been suspended and attached in the office of Regional Food Controller, Agra.

¶3It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has joined pursuant to the order dated

11.09.2023. Petitioner does not dispute that her original place of posting was in District Banda when she availed leaves and when she further demanded leave it was refused and she was placed under suspension and that in compliance of the order of suspension, she has submitted her joining.

¶4Learned Standing Counsel submits that since the petitioner has herself complied with the order of suspension dated 11.09.2023 giving her joining meaning thereby she was all well and fit to render her services and she was demanding leave for no justifiable reasons.

¶5Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the record, since the petitioner has already submitted his joining pursuant to the order dated 11.09.2023 on attachment basis, I do not find any justification now to interfere with the suspension order. Petitioner has herself submitted to the suspension order for the purpose of seeking subsistence allowance.

¶6In the circumstances, this petition stands disposed of with following directions: a) Chargesheet, if any, shall be served upon the petitioner within three weeks from today. b) Petitioner shall be submitting her reply within a further period of three weeks. c) After the submission of reply of the petitioner, departmental enquiry shall be concluded within the next one months' time provided petitioner cooperates. d) After the departmental enquiry is completed the disciplinary proceedings shall be concluded within the next two months' time.

¶6It is made clear that in the event departmental enquiry or the disciplinary proceedings are not concluded within the time prescribed for despite due cooperation of the petitioner as the case may be, the order of suspension dated

11.09.2023 shall stand revoked.

¶7It is further provided that during the period petitioner remains under suspension she will be continuously paid her subsistence allowance in accordance with law. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Deepika High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.