VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandramohan and 6 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
16 October 2023
Case no.
A482 32325/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 91 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 32325 of 2023 Applicant :- Chandramohan And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Gajendra Kumar,J.

¶1Heard learned counsel for applicants and the learned A.G.A. for State.

¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants to quash the impugned order dated 25.07.2023 passed by Additional Session Judge/ Special Judge (E.C. Act), Varanasi in Criminal Revision No.463 of 2022 and summoning order dated

13.09.2022 passed by Civil Judge (Junior Division) F.T.C. 02/ Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi in Complaint Case No. 21988 of 2022 (Rekha Tiwari Vs. Chandramohan and others), under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 354-B I.P.C., Police Station Phoolpur, District Varanasi, pending in the court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) F.T.C. 02/ Judicial Magistrate, Varanasi and further prayer to stay the further proceedings of the aforesaid case has been made.

¶3The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any ground to quash the criminal proceedings including summoning order dated 13.09.2022, therefore, the prayer for quashing the same is hereby refused.

¶5At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application before the court concerned and prayed that some protection may be provided to the applicant.

¶6Considering the request of the applicant and in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that if the applicant appears and moves an appropriate application for discharge under section 245(2) Cr.P.C. through counsel before the court below within one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order then the application of the applicant shall be considered and decided expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of filing of discharge application in accordance with law.

¶7Accordingly, the present application is disposed of.

¶8For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Shiv High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.