- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34653/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34653 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Shri Siddhi Vinayak Petroleum Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Kumar Mishra,Rajneesh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Baleshwar Chaturvedi Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the instant petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars.
¶2Accordingly, the instant petition stands dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty.
¶3This order has been passed with due assistance of Mr. Amit Saxena, learned Sr. Advocate, assisted by Mr. Varad Nath, learned Advocate as well as Mr. Baleshwar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the contesting-respondents. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Sachin High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.