- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 28542/2023
Judgment
Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT - C No. - 28542 of 2023 Petitioner :- M/S Aryan Enterprises Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Devendra Kumar,Shekhar Gangal Hon'ble Pritinker Diwaker,Chief Justice Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J. According to the petitioner, he has carried out entire work of interlocking and construction of drainage whereas this fact has been seriously disputed by respondent nos.2 and 3. Counsel appearing for respondent nos.2 and 3 submits that only 30% work has been completed by the petitioner and as such he is not entitled for any payment. Be that as it may, the petition involves number of disputed question of facts which cannot be adjudicated in the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. In view of above, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open for the petitioner to avail civil remedy as available to him under the law. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 rkg (Ashutosh Srivastava, J.) (Pritinker Diwaker, CJ.) High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.