- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 15 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 34555/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34555 of 2023 Petitioner :- Suresh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, Counsel for respondent no. 4, Land Management Committee.
¶2The instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus directing respondent No.2, Additional Commissioner Ist, Prayagraj to decide the case No. 01450 of 2018, Computerized case No. C201802000001450 (Maiku Saroj Vs. Dinesh and others) under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act within stipulated period.
¶3Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid revision is pending before respondent no.2 since 2018 for adjudication.
¶4Copy of the order sheet has been annexed as Annexure No.4 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding expeditiously.
¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Additional Commissioner Ist, Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned revision in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. Order Date :- 16.10.2023 Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.