VoxJuris
Home › High Courts › Allahabad High Court 2023 › High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Amarnath v. State of U.P. and Another

Disposed off/Decided on merits
Court
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Decided
15 October 2023
Case no.
WRIC 35674/2023

Judgment

Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35674 of 2023 Petitioner :- Amarnath Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Azad Rai Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.

¶1Counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Handia, District-Prayagraj, Mandal Prayagraj as respondent no.3 in the writ petition during course of the day.

¶2Heard Counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents and Mr. Azad Rai, Counsel for respondent no.2, Gaon Sabha.

¶3The instant petition has been filed for following relief:- " Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of writ of mandamus directing the Court concerned i.e. Court of learned Sub Divisional Magistrate, Mandal Prayagraj, Tehsil Handia, Prayagraj, to decide the case No. 6305 of 2022, Computerized case No. T202202030406305 (Amarnath and others Vs. State of U.P.), under Section 144 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously within a time bound period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."

¶4Counsel for the petitioner submitted that aforementioned suit for declaration filed at the instance of the petitioner is pending since

8.9.2022. He submitted that one year has been passed but proceeding has not been concluded. He further submitted that Gaon Sabha and State are the only defendants in the aforementioned suit for declaration. He further placed the copy of the order-sheet which has been annexed as Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition in order to demonstrate that case is not proceeding expeditiously.

¶5Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.3, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil-Handia, District Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned suit after framing issues and giving parties to lead evidence in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of eight months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 16.10.2023/ Vandana Y. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.