- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 23441/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23441 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt.Roopwati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brajesh Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Prashant Kumar,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.M.Upadhayay, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
¶2The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the order dated 5.6.2023 passed by the respondent no. 3 i.e. Sub Divisional Magistrate Sikarpur, Bulandshahar, whereby, he has directed to constitute a revenue team headed by Naib Tehsildar and initiate necessary proceedings in accordance with law.
¶3In response to the earlier order, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has placed the detailed instructions sent by Sub Divisional Magistrate concerned, which is taken on record. He submits that in response to the order dated
5.6.2023, the revenue team was constituted and the measurement took place on the spot and the claim qua the petitioner is already settled by the revenue team. In case, the petitioner has any grievance, she can agitate under U.P.Revenue Code 2006 before the appropriate Forum/Court.
¶4Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of the categorical instructions, we are not inclined to proceed on merit. Needless to say, it is always open for the petitioner to press the relief before the appropriate Forum/Court as per law.
¶5With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 A.K.Srivastava High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.