- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Case no.
- BAIL 23667/2021
Judgment
Court No. - 64 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23667 of 2021 Applicant :- Santosh Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Kumar Saxena,Jai Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
¶2The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Santosh Yadav, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 839 of 2018, under Sections 147/148/149/302/352 and 120-B IPC, Police Station Jhunsi, District-Prayagraj/Allahabad, during pendency of trial.
¶3This case has been listed peremptorily for today but none appears on behalf of the applicant.
¶4From the status report of the trial court it is clear that dates are being fixed for final hearing of the case, therefore, bail application of the applicant cannot be considered by this Court at such a belated stage of trial.
¶5Learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
¶6This Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant on bail at this stage.
¶7The bail application is accordingly rejected.
¶8The court below is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 SY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.