- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 16 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 33599/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 51 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 33599 of 2023 Petitioner :- Smt. Madhuri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shravan Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, State Law Officer for the State-respondents.
¶2The instant petition has been filed for mandamus directing the respondent no.2 i.e. Tahsildar (Judicial), Sadar, District-Azamgarh to decide the mutation Case No.9742 of 2022 (Computerized Case No.T202215060109742) (Madhuri vs. Bhrigumurti), under Section 34/35 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 within stipulated period.
¶3Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that more than 10 months have been passed but the aforementioned mutation case has not been decided. He further submitted that certified copy of order sheet of the case has been annexed as Annexure No.2 to the petition in order to demonstrate that the case is not proceeding according to the provisions contained under Rule 34 (7) of U.P. Revenue Code Rules, 2016.
¶4Without expressing any opinion on merits of the case and keeping in view of the facts and circumstances, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the aforementioned case on merits after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before him.
¶5Accordingly, the writ petition is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Rameez High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.