Sanjay Kumar Srivastava v. Provident Fund Commissioner and 4 Others

Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31113 of 2023 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Srivastava Respondent :- Provident Fund Commissioner And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Swapnil Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Jagdish Pathak,Karshit Nigam,Satyajit Mukerji Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard Mr. Swapnil Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Karshit Nigam, learned counsel for the respondent nos.2 to 5 and Mr. Satyajit Mukerji, learned counsel for respondent no.1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct the respondent no.1 i.e. Provident Fund Commissioner, to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner as contained in representation dated 29.04.2023 and make payment of all dues including provident fund to the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has given an application with respect to the payment of arrears of salary, gratuity, bonus, earned leave, provident fund and pension before respondent no.1 but nothing has been done till date, therefore, a direction may be issued to decide the same, within stipulated period. On the aforesaid, learned counsel for the respondent, emphasizing on page 44 of the writ petition, submits that pension has already been paid to the petitioner, which is evident from PPO No.UPGKP00102080. As regards the prayer for other benefits it is the employer who has to be approached. Accordingly, the writ petition is misconceived and is dismissed. Order Date :- 17.10.2023 Rahul. High Court of Judicature at Allahabad