- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 30042/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 47 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 30042 of 2023 Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brahma Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J.
¶1Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record.
¶2The present petition has been filed challenging the order dated
2.8.2023 passed by respondent no.2.
¶3Perused the order impugned.
¶4From the perusal of the order impugned, it is clear that this is not an order but only a report submitted to the respondent no.3, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kaushambi and the ultimate orders have to be passed by the respondent no.3.
¶5Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that against the report submitted by respondent no.2, this writ petition is not maintainable. Petitioner may challenge the order, if any, passed against him by the respondent no.3 in accordance with law.
¶6In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
¶7Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take appropriate action, in case, the order is passed by S.D.M against the petitioner. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 S. Singh High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.