- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Case no.
- WRIC 35120/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 35120 of 2023 Petitioner :- Vikram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ulajhan Singh Bind Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. Hon'ble Surendra Singh-I,J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner. The grievance of the petitioner in the present petition is that respondent nos. 4 and 5 are interfering in the operation of the brick industry of the petitioner. The dispute in the present petition does not involve any question of public law so as to require any examination by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has the remedy to institute appropriate proceedings before the concerned civil court. The petition is dismissed. The petitioner may exercise any other remedy available to him in law. Order Date :- 18.10.2023 Satyam High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.