- Court
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
- Decided
- 17 October 2023
- Case no.
- A482 37561/2023
Judgment
Court No. - 86 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 37561 of 2023 Applicant :- Manoj Chaturvedi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhakar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
¶1Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
¶2This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the bailable warrant dated
25.05.2023 and entire proceedings of Case No. 222 of 2002 (Ramnaresh Vs. Manoj Chaturvedi and others), having S.S.T. No. 18 of 2003, under Sections 395, 397 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, District Etah, pending in the court of Special Judge (D.A.A.), Etah.
¶3After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has made a statement at the Bar, on instructions, that he does not want to press other prayers made in the instant application and states that the applicants are ready to appear before the court below and seek their bail and that their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
¶4Per contra, learned AGA states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application.
¶5In view of the above, in case the applicants appear before the court below within three weeks from today and seek bail, their release be considered in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51.
¶6With the aforesaid observations, this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of. Order Date :- 18.10.2023/Nadim High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Source: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through the eCourts High Court services, via the Indian High Court Judgments open dataset by Dattam Labs (CC BY 4.0). Text was extracted from the official PDF and may contain conversion errors. Check the official PDF before relying on it.